Re: Scripting in Gnome
- From: "Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro" <gjc inescporto pt>
- To: jamie <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk>
- Cc: Sean Middleditch <elanthis awesomeplay com>, GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Scripting in Gnome
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 23:14:49 +0000
A Qui, 2004-02-05 às 19:16, jamie escreveu:
> On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 18:45, Sean Middleditch wrote:
>
> > > I was just suggesting if bonobo was going to use D-Bus in the future
> and
> > > so would have been rewritten in parts then it might also be handy to
> > > have an xml representation of the IDL as well. You can hardly deny
> that
> > > it is less effort to transform xml version of IDL into language
> bindings
> > > for currently non-supported languages.
> >
> > Why would XML work better than IDL? IDL could just be compiled to
> stubs
> > that use D-BUS. The "oh, it's XML, so it's just going to be easier
> and
> > better" rehashing is getting old. Especially given detailed claims to
> > the contrary by others in this thread.
>
> Whether you use XSLT or a built in xml parser, its quicker to develop a
> programme to read in and process xml than plain text - okay? Im fed up
Have you ever heard of libIDL ?
--
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
<gjc inescporto pt> <gustavo users sourceforge net>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]