Re: Vino: proposal for inclusion in GNOME 2.8

<quote who="Mark McLoughlin">

> I had originally planned not to propose Vino for inclusion to GNOME 2.8
> until I had a clear idea where Vino was going with things like terminal
> services, security and authentication but perhaps its useful to get this
> in 2.8.

Just to clarify, because everyone seems to be arguing about it (on IRC):

You're planning to use this existing work as a base to do all the really
interesting gdm roaming/reuse stuff, and have no intention to *remove* or
significantly re-engineer the current user-daemon implementation and config
panel, right? ie. this will continue to exist in future releases largely

- Jeff

-- 2005: Canberra, Australia      
   "The Motif interface, with chunkier controls, felt more like a ghetto
                           blaster." - Liam Quin

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]