Re: Vino: proposal for inclusion in GNOME 2.8

On Sun, 2004-07-18 at 10:23 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> 	We ignore any incoming input on both the listening socket and any
> connected sockets. Effectively, the door is closed. I don't see a
> problem ...

Well, I do. An open socket that ignores packets is one order of
magnitude more vulnerable to potential problems than a closed socket.

You can stop listening and still keep currectly connected users on-hold.

I'm trying to understand vino enough so I can provide a patch that plugs
that out.


+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]