On Sun, 2004-07-18 at 10:23 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > We ignore any incoming input on both the listening socket and any > connected sockets. Effectively, the door is closed. I don't see a > problem ... Well, I do. An open socket that ignores packets is one order of magnitude more vulnerable to potential problems than a closed socket. You can stop listening and still keep currectly connected users on-hold. I'm trying to understand vino enough so I can provide a patch that plugs that out. Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part