Re: [Fwd: Re: Themes]

[Maciej Katafiasz <mnews22 wp pl>]

W liście z sob, 24-07-2004, godz. 14:48, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
pisze: 
> > >   I think this is quite obvious but... why not call it SmoothEngine? 
> > > Nothing else could be clearer.  Just my 2 cents...
> > 
> > Read again the message Link fwd'd. Calling a _theme_ using smooth engine
> > "SmoothEngine" is far, far worse than calling it just "Smooth". 
> 
>   I'm sorry.  I think I misunderstood the issue.  I thought you were
> trying to come up with a name for the engine, not the theme.

OK, that explains things

>   Calling the engine "SmoothEngine" would allow the theme to be called
> "Smooth" without confusion, wouldn't it?

Well, it's already called Smooth engine, I don't see need for StudlyCaps
here. We're not markedroids, are we ;)

Cheers,
Maciej

PS. FWIW, I like "Glider" name. It's unrelated to anything enough to
have that "poetic" touch :)

-- 
"Tautologizm to coś tautologicznego"
   Maciej Katafiasz <mnews2 wp pl>
       http://mathrick.blog.pl