The case for cross-desktop dockability and notification-area applet ideology revision.
- From: Alastair Poole <support unixtrix com>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: The case for cross-desktop dockability and notification-area applet ideology revision.
- Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 15:39:37 +0000
The case for notification area applet default integration and revision.
GNOME is becoming a usable desktop. Though there are some shortcomings that I
as a representative of other users who share the same concerns would like to
address to you the developers.
Red hat and a few other distributions have their own interface agenda's, this
I understand. This proposal is not directed towards such corporate
decisions, but rather at the default GNOME two paneled layout which we have
all become accustomed to since the 2.0 release.
Navigating between applications via the window-list applet is a time tested
method, which we have all grown to enjoy. It allows a visual indication of
application/window titles in a confined area, increasing the total desktop
working space. This is a good thing.
However the more applications which are opened, inevitably the more cluttered
the list becomes, making the reading of titles harder and in extreme cases of
busyness, actual selection difficult.
I have noticed there are applications to which a visual window-list indicator
is unnecessary. Such include Gnome's Gaim. And when enabled to function
with the notification-area applet, the window-list becomes more readable and
hence the desktop as a whole more usable.
Understanding that Gnome has in the past decided not to take advantage of such
a feature, there are not so many applications which use it's advantages in
the Gnome suite.
I would now like to talk about other applications, some of different widget
orientation, which in their own environments do take advantage of this
feature. KDE's KPPP is a prime example, as yet no alternative is included
with the Gnome distribution. If allowed to dock, more space is cleared for
the window-list, this also is an optional function to KPPP, but it is popular
all the same. As Linux and Gnome are free software it seems likely third and
second world adoption is imminent. Modems and the PPP protocol are unlikely
to become obsolete for a long time.
Another example of such an application would be Korganiser, itself popular but
this time it's functionality is dependent on dock-ability.
Choice is something open-source software provides to users. Non inclusion of
cross-desktop dock-ability, restricts users choice in the applications they
can use and/or how they use them. It is a feature which users are accustomed
to on Microsoft, Macintosh and other open-source desktop alternatives,
including KDE, the ever increasingly popular XFCE and Fluxbox. Each of these
alternatives offer the docking service for GTK+/GNOME applications with these
features, as well as there own and KDE docking support.
The current panel-notification ideology is one for pure notification, to avoid
the system tray horrors from Windows. May I add that such horrors are often
a resultant of application enforcement in a region central and UN-removable
from the Windows interface. Sometimes four or five media applications will
battle for the space, others which users do not choose or knew had been
installed. Open-source ideology assures these horrors will not occur to such
extreme degrees. Please consider the current function of the applet and how
it could be potentially expanded.
Before the panel-notification area could become truly functional for users,
who themselves like the choice to mix their preferred applications and
desktops, cross-desktop dock-ability must be included.
It seems, there is still space available on the upper panel, I feel that
inclusion and function revision of the panel-notification area would benefit
the usability of GNOME desktop and open-source desktop users in general. As
well as the overall perception by potential and current users.
I finish by asking that you take these arguments and their implications into
account and urge you to strongly consider the suggestions contained within.
I choose to speak as I too want to see GNOME and other open-source desktop
alternatives succeed in both market penetration and functionality.
Sincerely
Alastair Poole
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]