Gnome 3 [Was: Re: Where we stand in regard to the future platform / desktop technology]

On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 12:29 +0100, jamie wrote:
> yes the proposal by Havoc for 2.8 was C and Python with GObject getting
> enough type information for full introspection. I think most people
> agree this is desirable and if no one objects then we should go forward
> with this as a short term solution.
> For Gnome 3, the options increase to having C and Mono (with the Python
> in 2.8 running on Mono).

You keep referring to GNOME 3; presumably, this is version (GNOME 2.8) +

I don't speak for the release team here, or community consensus, but we
may not be bumping the major version quite yet. I don't think we know
what GNOME 3 is going to contain, or whether we'll be ready for it in a
year from now.

But that's just me.

Andrew Sobala <aes gnome org>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]