Le samedi 15 avril 2006 à 13:16 +0100, Thomas Wood a écrit : > Personally, I think it's understandable that artists may choose not to > distribute their work under the (L)GPL, which is primarily a license for > software. As long as the license they choose upholds the values of Free > Software, I don't see it as a problem. However, I know there have been > various lengthy discussions elsewhere about the status of the Creative > Commons licenses, so I would like to have some advice before continuing. I think I would ask those people to wait for the 3.0 version of the Creative Commons licenses, which promise to solve a number of small issues[1] that were raised with 2.0 and which are still present in 2.5. [1] http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin mouette ens-lyon org `. `' joss debian org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=