Re: Proposal for LAT inclusion in GNOME 2.18

[Loren Bandiera <lorenb mmgsecurity com>]

On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 21:04 +0200, Sven Herzberg wrote:

> FUD, FUD, FUD. Do really want to argue on that level? GQ is a GTK+ 2 
> application for more than 3 years now. 

Argue about what? I haven't used GQ in a long time, I never claimed to
be an expert on it. I merely offered my opinion. 

Just because I don't follow your project doesn't mean I'm trying to
spread FUD.

As far as the Gtk+ 1.0 stuff. Last time I used GQ that's what it was.
When Ross mentioned it was still being maintained I looked the
screenshots here:

http://gq-project.org/get_information.php

That looks like Gtk 1.0 to me. It's not my fault that you don't update
your screenshots. That's your responsibility.

Shocking as this may seem, the purpose of my original post was to talk
about the merits of including LAT into GNOME. Not talk about GQ. 

I don't have anything against your project.

-- 
Loren Bandiera <lorenb mmgsecurity com>
MMG Security, Inc.