Re: Git vs SVN (was: Can we improve things?)

["Kevin Kubasik" <kevin kubasik net>]

It is worth noting that the new release of subversion will support
some of its own merge tracking (which would/will be nice).

http://subversion.tigris.org/merge-tracking/

I think the proposal to add git-daemon to www.gnome.org is a good
idea, no weather the best move is to immediately use git in this
capacity or to examine the possibility of using one of the other
DSCM's (see http://live.gnome.org/DistributedSCM for the evolving
discussion of advantages/disadvantages) I'm more or less impartial on
this point, however, I do think its something that should be
considered, as whichever we choose for this private hosting will
invariably become the immediate frontrunner for the eventual
migration.



On 9/14/07, Hubert Figuiere <hub figuiere net> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 20:21 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 05:36:36AM -0700, Sanford Armstrong wrote:
> > > Yes, using a command called "svndumpfilter".  You'd have to not care
> > > about your revision numbers being resequenced.
> >
> > People care about that?
> >
> > I always renumber them. However, by default it doesn't.
>
> When using svnmerge, it stores the revision # already merged. That would
> break it if the revision are renumbered.
>
> Just my $0.02.
>
> Hub
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
>


-- 
Cheers,
Kevin Kubasik
http://kubasik.net/blog