On Do, 2008-03-20 at 22:39 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 05:33:38PM -0400, Andrew Cowie wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 22:26 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote: > > > > > - checking of sane versions (no 'rc1' 'beta1' etc) > > > > Why not? If a project wants to do that, that's their business. > > Because it confuses the ordering. There is no reliable way to determine > the latest versions. isnt there "ls -v", which we could use for that? daniel > So I cannot get e.g. the .0 case right. Currently > it is (IMO hackishly) done by assuming the versions are installed in > order, but that breaks down whenever a new module is added (often > permissions are delayed until there have been a few releases.. then > install-module shouldn't be too confused if versions are installed > out-of-order). > -- this mail was sent using 100% recycled electrons ================================================ daniel g. siegel <dgsiegel gmail com> http://home.cs.tum.edu/~siegel gnupg key id: 0x6EEC9E62 fingerprint: DE5B 1F64 9034 1FB6 E120 DE10 268D AFD5 6EEC 9E62 encrypted email preferred
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part