Re: Module proposal: dconf

[Ghee Teo <Ghee Teo Sun COM>]

Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 23:06 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
>   
> > 2009/10/13 Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>:
> >     
> > > > Ryan is a bit sad to not get feedback on his proposal, so a bit more
> > > > seriously: I think what we probably need is a migration plan. Should we
> > > > move all the code from gconf to dconf in one cycle (if possible)? Should
> > > > apps implement migration for the data in gconf? etc.
> > > >
> > > >         
> > > I think it makes sense to do the migration for all the apps at once.
> > >       
> > Are we speking about:
> >   a) all GNOME Desktop applications
> >   b) all applications hosted on git.gnome.org
> >   c) all GNOME/GTK+ apps using GConf :)
> >
> > ??
> >
> > Serius: what's the plan for thirdy part applications?
> >     
>
> if dconf listens to changes in gconf, 3rd party apps would just need to
> link to glib/GSettings instead of libgconf, and their migration would be
> done automatically, right?
>   
If dconf listens to changes in gconf, does not 3rd party apps would just 
work?
This is a question of run-time interoperability, is dconf inter operate 
with gconf clients?
Please clarify this. I can see lots of reasons why 3rd party doesn't 
want to re-link to glib/GSettings :)

-Ghee
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
>