Re: API documentation from introspection data

[Alberto Ruiz <aruiz gnome org>]

2012/2/24 Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu sugarlabs org>

That sounds great functionality. The webapp will file bugs in BZ and
attach patches to it? Or will maintainers have to go through the
webapp?

We can figure something out, for now it's just an idea, haven't thought of the best way to implement it. What do you think maintainers would prefer? The only thing it wouldn't be easy to provide is generating actual valid patches.

 

Regards,

Tomeu

> 2012/2/23 Stefan Sauer <ensonic hora-obscura de>
>>
>> On 02/23/2012 04:18 PM, Shaun McCance wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>> > Honestly, I think all of us (me included) are getting too hung up on
>> > the tools. What we really need is better writing. No amount of tool
>> > development is going to save you from a lack of good content.
>> Agree, but one important part is that the tools are working in a way,
>> that people to see them as an annoyance and turn it off. gtk-doc has
>> quite a bit of legacy here unfortunately that is not easy to change :/
>>
>> Stefan
>> > --
>> > Shaun
>> >
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> desktop-devel-list mailing list
>> desktop-devel-list gnome org
>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Alberto Ruiz
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

-- 
Cheers,
Alberto Ruiz