Re: API documentation from introspection data

[Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu sugarlabs org>]

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:57, Alberto Ruiz <aruiz gnome org> wrote:
>
>
> 2012/2/24 Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu sugarlabs org>
>>
>> That sounds great functionality. The webapp will file bugs in BZ and
>> attach patches to it? Or will maintainers have to go through the
>> webapp?
>
>
> We can figure something out, for now it's just an idea, haven't thought of
> the best way to implement it. What do you think maintainers would prefer?
> The only thing it wouldn't be easy to provide is generating actual valid
> patches.

Guess it depends on how much value they perceive that this will get
them. But of course, I would expect to be easier to sell something
that doesn't change their workflow, as they have to review patches
anyway and git-bz makes it so much easier.

Regards,

Tomeu

>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tomeu
>>
>> > 2012/2/23 Stefan Sauer <ensonic hora-obscura de>
>> >>
>> >> On 02/23/2012 04:18 PM, Shaun McCance wrote:
>> >>
>> >> <snip>
>> >> > Honestly, I think all of us (me included) are getting too hung up on
>> >> > the tools. What we really need is better writing. No amount of tool
>> >> > development is going to save you from a lack of good content.
>> >> Agree, but one important part is that the tools are working in a way,
>> >> that people to see them as an annoyance and turn it off. gtk-doc has
>> >> quite a bit of legacy here unfortunately that is not easy to change :/
>> >>
>> >> Stefan
>> >> > --
>> >> > Shaun
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> desktop-devel-list mailing list
>> >> desktop-devel-list gnome org
>> >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cheers,
>> > Alberto Ruiz
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > desktop-devel-list mailing list
>> > desktop-devel-list gnome org
>> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Alberto Ruiz