Re: LGPL
- From: Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com>
- To: Marcus Brubaker <spoon elpaso net>
- cc: gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: LGPL
- Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 20:22:42 -0400 (EDT)
On Sun, 11 Apr 1999, Marcus Brubaker wrote:
> Unless I'm mistaken, I think the problem he is having here is that the
> LGPL allows dynamic linking with uncompatible licenses, but he needs to do
> static linking, which is disallowed via the LGPL.
It's not disallowed - you just have to provide a way for the user to link
the executable with a different version of the library that uses the same
ABI. The typical way of doing this is to provide a .o file and linking
instructions.
-- Elliot
"We're sorry, we didn't know it was supposed to be invisible."
- Sign carried outside US embassy.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]