Re: Grammar problems in gnomecal
- From: James Aylett <dj-gnome insigma com>
- To: gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Grammar problems in gnomecal
- Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 11:35:49 +0100
On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 06:23:56PM +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
[Word orders in sentence translation]
> > This is one of the things which makes localisation very difficult. As a
> > thought, if we were using libglade there (we don't appear to be, at any
> > rate), the XML interface definition could be localised. I have a feeling
> > that someone is going to start shouting that that's evil (and they may have
> > a point :-), but it does mean that this sort of thing doesn't have to be
> > bludgeoned into some horrible pseudo-language just so it will translate
> > better.
>
> Libglade will not help in this situation. This is quite a difficult
> problem. It might turn out that we need a date formating library that
> special contains special cases for different languages where translations
> are not trivial. The only problem with this is that is that the library
> might grow quite large.
Erm ... possibly I've reconstructed this message wrongly and you weren't
talking about that at all. I'm talking about situations where you have:
[Every] [<field>] [bumpers] [day(s)]
as four separate UI objects (two display fields, an editable field, and a
pair of bumpers). In a situation like that, it strikes me that libglade with
localised interface files _would_ work. It certainly works in similar
situations on other systems ...
> > While we're talking about localisation issues, is there a way I can get
> > GNOME things in general to use British date formats (dd/mm/yy[yy]) instead
> > of US?
>
> As for date formatting problems, this depends on the application. I
> noticed that gnumeric has an en_GB translation that corrects all the date
> formatting strings, so a good start is to set LANG to en_GB. For other
> applications, you might not have so much luck.
Hmm. If I do this, it appears to break the date formatting options, so that
all of them format as d/m/yy; I just want it to recognise dates in that
format, but display them as (in this case) d-mmm-yyy (which is what I've set
for these cells in the formatting options). Is this a bug, or am I confused?
> If the application uses strftime to format dates, the simple fix is to
> make sure that the format string is surounded by a call to gettext [...]
Cheers,
James
--
/--------------------------------------------------------------------------\
James Aylett www.zap.uk.eu.org
james@tartarus.org www.footlights.org
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]