--prefix and --sysconfdir (Re: Simplifying package installation.)
- From: Karl Eichwalder <ke gnu franken de>
- To: gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Cc: gnome-hackers nuclecu unam mx
- Subject: --prefix and --sysconfdir (Re: Simplifying package installation.)
- Date: 27 Aug 1999 06:54:15 +0200
Miguel de Icaza <miguel@gnu.org> writes:
| This is very strange. besides the topic we have been discussing today
| in g-h, all applications use the prefix.
Yes, I know, they do.
| Ie, I run GNOME myself in /gnome on my laptop and in /opt/gnome at
| work.
Yes, again, I remember me, you wrote it long time ago.
And you're right, most programs are running pretty good and often it's
only a minor patch to fix something. Please note, that I'm using
--prefix=/opt/gnome
--sysconfdir=/etc/opt/gnome
Trouble will arise (not always, but...), if you'll install other
components with --prefix=/usr (e.g., ORBit, libxml, enlightment, etc.);
I guess, this should work, too, since these applications do not
necessarily depend on GNOME. E.g., it happens that the control center
refuses to work; if back from vacation, I'll have a closer look at this
issue.
And than, there is this strange animal (g)mc ;-) I wondering how
difficult it would be to implement:
--prefix (for the standalone "mc", value /usr)
--sysconfdir (ditto, value /etc)
--gmc-prefix (for gmc, value /opt/gnome)
--gmc-sysconfdir (ditto, value /etc/opt/gnome)
Do people think, such a configuration flexibility could be useful?
--
work : ke@suse.de
Karl Eichwalder private: ke@gnu.franken.de
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]