RE: panel widget as library?
- From: "Fox, Kevin M" <KMFox mail bhi-erc com>
- To: "'Elliot Lee'" <sopwith redhat com>, Miguel de Icaza <miguel gnu org>, "'gnome-devel-list gnome org'" <gnome-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: RE: panel widget as library?
- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 13:42:51 -0700
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elliot Lee [mailto:sopwith@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 30, 1999 11:42 AM
> To: Miguel de Icaza
> Subject: Re: panel widget as library?
>
>
> On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
>
> > > >Is there any plans to make a shared memory standard
> inter orb protocol? It
> > > >would speed corba up to the point where it can be much
> more usefull.
> > >
> > > On what grounds do you base your speedup assertion?
> >
> > Intuition would tell me "transfering large ammounts of data". Say,
> > transfering large sets of data. Large as in 20 megs per second.
>
> If you are doing this, you should use multithreading or
> something in the
> same address space.
>
> The typical CORBA request sends comparatively little data.
>
> The main problem with implementing a shared memory transport is the
> complexity involved. You have to have at least one shared
> memory segment
> for each client you connect to, you have worry about security
> (how do you
> allow connections between processes running as different
> users?), you have
Well, you can use IIOP right now between users. So it dosnt seem like IIOP
wories about it. :)
> to worry about signalling the other end through another
> mechanism that the
> data is in the shm segment waiting to be processed, etc. etc.
>
> -- Elliot
> Who me? I just wander from room to room.
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail gnome-devel-list-request@gnome.org with
> "unsubscribe"
> as the Subject.
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]