Re: Coming proposal (was: Window Manager compliance)
- From: Stephen Quattlebaum <quatt001 bama ua edu>
- To: gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Coming proposal (was: Window Manager compliance)
- Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 22:25:19 -0500 (CDT)
>
> I believe the background, screensaver, desktop event sounds, etc.
> should be handled by Gnome.
>
<snip>
> 10) File Management (we should enforce the use of gmc)
No! gmc crashes constantly for me! Don't know why!
Of course, this is temporary I'm sure...but "we should enforce the use of"
makes me nervous anyway.
<snip>
> disagree with this idea (and why)?
I wouldn't disagree, per se, except to caution that anything that the
window manager is *required* to turn off for gnome should be able to be
turned back on by the user. Why? Sometimes, the WM simply does a better
job than gnome, and a user who knows they're doing won't want to be
restricted by requirements like that. For example, E allows different
desktop backgrounds for each virtual desktop, something which the Gnome
control panel doesn't do (as far as I know).
****
Stephen Quattlebaum
quatt001@bama.ua.edu
This email composed of %100 post-consumer electrons.
The opinions expressed by me are not necessarily the opinions of the
University of Alabama or it's faculty/administration (but they should be).
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]