Re: Why not to split gmc and other gnome applications into threads?

From: redhog mini dhs org
To: Mathieu Lacage <lacage email enst fr>
cc: gnome-devel-list gnome org, Egil Möller <redhog lysator liu se>
Subject: Re: Why not to split gmc and other gnome applications into threads?
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 00:47:40 +0100 (CET)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sounds just like what I supposed - just that the front-ends and the
back-end are all threads in one app. That of course restricts other apps
possibilities to participiate, but significantly speeds things up...

<A Href="http://www.tekmetrics.com/transcript.shtml?pid=29943">TekMetrics Online Public Transcript (e-certifications[tm])</A><Br>
<A Href="http://mini.dhs.org/PGP%20Public%20key.asc">PGP Public key</A><Br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v0.9.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE4Jg+fHeQ6HSAJlUwRAufuAJ9UyG9ev5ysB4fFusFX1MQogYPz7QCdGRK5
MtyJb0Pi3wwPmGm0/NoPuX8=
=MzK1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: Why not to split gmc and other gnome applications into threads?
  - From: Mathieu Lacage

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]