Re: Information Applet Thingy
- From: Sean Middleditch <sean middleditch iname com>
- To: gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Information Applet Thingy
- Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 15:36:14 -0400
Yes! Perfect! That's even better than my original idea that no one seemed to
understand!
Sean Middleditch
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Matt Greenfield wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Martijn van Beers <martijn@earthling.net>
> To: <gnome-devel-list@gnome.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 11:07 AM
> Subject: Re: Information Applet Thingy
>
>
> > On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 06:48:10PM -0400, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> > > Correct me if I'm wrong. A normal applet must ALWAYS be on the panel,
> or be
> > > completely removed, no? And if you start an applet, it jsut puts it on
> the
> > I don't know what you mean by this exactly, but irssi launches a
> > status applet when it starts up, and removes it again when it is
> > closed.
> > > first available place, on the first panel, even if the panel is full. I
> run
> > > two panels, and the default panel to place applets is full.
> > > The applets aren't even visible. I have to manually plave applets on
> >
> > I agree that it would be convenient to be able to control where an
> > applet should be placed, yes.
>
> An applet 'container' would be the solution, yes? Sort of like window
> groups in e, except applet groups. A container that all new applets go
> into, or perhaps just applets that want to go into it. Then you could
> define multiple containers with perhaps special conditions on them,
> conditions of what type of applets they should attract. Then you could say
> define a Launchers container, a Monitors container, etc.
>
> This would be some nice functionality to go into the panel in HEAD perhaps?
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail gnome-devel-list-request@gnome.org with "unsubscribe"
> as the Subject.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]