Re: thoughts on gtk, after Hexsweeper
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: Jeff Waugh <jdub aphid net>
- Cc: gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: thoughts on gtk, after Hexsweeper
- Date: 23 Oct 2000 23:17:02 -0400
Jeff Waugh <jdub aphid net> writes:
> <quote who="Owen Taylor">
>
> > - Don't use C; In my opinion, C is a library programming language
> > not an app programming language.
>
>
> ...which begs the question.
Well, knowing Liam's background, I was, of course, suggesting
using the Postscript bindings for GTK+.
Regards,
Owen
[
Actually, the language bindings I tend to promote most are
gnome-python. Perl's another candidate, as would be guile,
Ruby and a few others.
For compiled languages, the field is slimmer; the Ada
bindings are will-maintained, but, ugh, Ada... I'd like
to see a nice set of native Java bindings that work with gcj.
But in any case if I can get away with it, I prefer to avoid:
- segfaults
- memory management
- excess typing
- configure, compile, link
]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]