Re: official support for more scripting languages in gnome needed
- From: "Andreas L. Gustafsson" <ante Update UU SE>
- To: kh_naba 123india com
- Cc: James Henstridge <james daa com au>, Ben Ford <ben kalifornia com>, Andy Tai <atai gnu org>, gnome-devel-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org, hvv hippo ru, atai atai org
- Subject: Re: official support for more scripting languages in gnome needed
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:10:50 +0100 (MET)
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Naba Kumar wrote:
> Well, I think it doesn't matter in which scripting language the tool is
> written.
> The languages were designed to suit perticular domain of programming
> task. If it weren't, don't you think there will only one programming
> language?
>
> So IMO, it doesn't matter what language a programmer chooses, as long
> as he/she chooses the right one.
>
> Imagin writing a multithread FFT (fast fourier transformation) program
> written in perl or lisp. And imagine writing a database search and replace
> program in C.
FFT works very well in Lisp, if you choose a lisp that is designed for
speed and use the compiler. CMUCL works fine.
/Andreas
================== I'm powered by Emacs! ======================
** the choice of a GNU generation **
SF-fan and tea drinker. Beware! e-mail: ante update uu se
=========== Make a choice, protect your Freedom! ==============
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]