RE: Trivial patches on b.g.o covers dust.
- From: Andrew Sobala <aes gnome org>
- To: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- Cc: aliakc web de, gnome-devel-list gnome org, gnome-bugsquad gnome org
- Subject: RE: Trivial patches on b.g.o covers dust.
- Date: 22 Apr 2003 11:24:06 +0100
On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 10:53, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
> One more thing: If you have confirmed that these bugs still exist then it is
> probably a good idea to move them from GNOMEVER2.2 to GNOMEVER2.3. But
> again, that's an issue for the bugsquad.
>
It's really nice to use the latest GNOMEVER keyword if possible.
> Thanks for the input, though I do think it's probably best to put specific
> comments in specific bugs.
>
> Some patches/bugs don't seem to get the attention they deserve, and it
> should be improved to encourage more contributors and more contributions.
> But it's not as bad as you think.
A lot of these bugs need the PATCH keyword adding. The other half to
getting these bugs reviewed is mailing desktop-devel with links to the
report pages and generally trying to jump down maintainers backs about
applying them - this is something I used to do but have not done lately.
I'll send an e-mail to desktop-devel later today.
Adding comments to the bugs can also help because it spams the
maintainers.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ali Akcaagac [mailto:aliakc web de]
> > Sent: Dienstag, 22. April 2003 10:59
> > To: gnome-devel-list gnome org
> > Subject: RE: Trivial patches on b.g.o covers dust.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 09:41, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
> > > It really does help to sometimes add a "what's the status
> > of this?" comment
> > > to bugs/patches that seem to be forgotten. You don't need
> > to be a maintainer
> > > to help make sense of a bug and maybe drive it towards a
> > decision. The
> > > bug-squad probably have ideas about this too.
> >
> > I now went through all 184 reported control-center bugs and found a
> > lot of ready made patches that only needs to get reviewed and
> > applied. Many of the stuff fixes HIG related things, crashes and so
> > on. There are even various patches where the committer begged
> > multiple times to have them reviewed and committed. Here the list.
> >
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102149
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104907
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104973
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105004
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105700
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106124
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106350
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108848
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108850
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109323
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109529
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109534
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109748
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110985
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111014
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111029
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111049
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111086
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111103
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85003
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94265
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97138
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97883
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98202
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99532
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99533
--
Andrew Sobala <aes gnome org>
"A freudian slip is when you say one thing but you mean your mother." -- unknown
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]