Re: gtk+ version in cvs

[Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>]

On Sun, 2003-05-04 at 10:27, Gerold J. Wucherpfennig wrote:
> I've built gtk+ from cvs HEAD, but unfortunately the
> version number is 2.2.0 and not 2.2.1 (gtk+-2.0.pc).
> My local cvs tree is clean and up-to-date, so I can't
> understand this. I'm using cvs HEAD.
> Has anybody an idea what's wrong?

If you want the newer-than-2.2.1 version, use the gtk-2-2
branch of GTK+.

HEAD is always a bit risky, one way or the other; we'll bump
the version to 2.3.x soon, but haven't done so yet for various
reasons.

Regards,
                                     Owen