Re: gtk+ version in cvs

["Gerold J. Wucherpfennig" <gjwucherpfennig gmx net>]

On Sunday 04 May 2003 16:46, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-05-04 at 10:27, Gerold J. Wucherpfennig wrote:
> > I've built gtk+ from cvs HEAD, but unfortunately the
> > version number is 2.2.0 and not 2.2.1 (gtk+-2.0.pc).
> > My local cvs tree is clean and up-to-date, so I can't
> > understand this. I'm using cvs HEAD.
> > Has anybody an idea what's wrong?
>
> If you want the newer-than-2.2.1 version, use the gtk-2-2
> branch of GTK+.

Thanks, but that's not my problem.

The problem is that with cvs HEAD, I get a gtk 2.2.0.
The strange thing is, that I did a clean build and my local cvs dir is
up-to-date.

Then eog fails, because it wants gtk 2.2.1, but I don't have that :-(
 

>
> HEAD is always a bit risky, one way or the other; we'll bump
> the version to 2.3.x soon, but haven't done so yet for various
> reasons.

No RISC, no fun ;-)


Regards,

Gerold