Re: gtk+ version in cvs


I've had similar problems with gnomecvs head a couple of times - local repos seems to get stuck in a time warp. No idea what is going on, but I just delete the whole repository and check the whole thing out again. Make sure your local repository really is HEAD (make sure you don't have a CVS/Tag) before doing anything drastic. One day I'll try to investigate what is going on properly.


Gerold J. Wucherpfennig wrote:

On Sunday 04 May 2003 16:46, Owen Taylor wrote:
On Sun, 2003-05-04 at 10:27, Gerold J. Wucherpfennig wrote:
I've built gtk+ from cvs HEAD, but unfortunately the
version number is 2.2.0 and not 2.2.1 (gtk+-2.0.pc).
My local cvs tree is clean and up-to-date, so I can't
understand this. I'm using cvs HEAD.
Has anybody an idea what's wrong?
If you want the newer-than-2.2.1 version, use the gtk-2-2
branch of GTK+.

Thanks, but that's not my problem.

The problem is that with cvs HEAD, I get a gtk 2.2.0.
The strange thing is, that I did a clean build and my local cvs dir is

Then eog fails, because it wants gtk 2.2.1, but I don't have that :-(

HEAD is always a bit risky, one way or the other; we'll bump
the version to 2.3.x soon, but haven't done so yet for various

No RISC, no fun ;-)



gnome-devel-list mailing list
gnome-devel-list gnome org

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]