RE: gconf

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 16:48 +0100, Foster, Gareth wrote:
> 
> Oh dear.
> 
> That page goes someway to relieve/explain my frustration yesterday. I had
> assumed that it was either my ineptitude, my inability to find the right
> documentation or the lack or said documentation.
> 
> Is gconf actually considered to be quite 'broken' in some regards then?
|
My view is that it provides the right desktop user experience and
largely works, but could provide a better developer and sysadmin
experience, and could have less-ugly code.

gconf is basically the right design but a lot of the details are wrong,
is another way to put it.

Havoc