Re: Anjuta2 renaming status

[arief_mulya <arief bna telkomsel co id>]

Dear all,


What a nice thing to hear then. I was afraid that my bringing up the
issue in a such a late moment would give trouble for you John, which in
fact it doesn't. But I do apologize for not bringing this up earlier.
 
For me, a name brings up first impression about a thing. And my heart do
falls for romantism when I know the story behind Anjuta name. But I
don't know what could be the nice new name for Anjuta2. Maybe Naba have
suggestions? As he is the one who name it at the first place.

Btw, for Naba,
Where can we see a picture of this nice lady? 

Best Regards,

-- 
arief_mulya <arief bna telkomsel co id>
Damai Itu Indah

On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 12:29, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> Well I wrote a quick python utility to help in the renaming and also
> have something to show the small python learning group I am part of. 
> Imagine my supprise when the newly renamed scaffold compiled and
> installed on the first try.  Python rocks.  There is still a bit more to
> do before I feel like diffing and submitting it.  One problem that pops
> up is one of the external plugins (too tired to check which one right
> now) uses one function from anjuta2.  Either this function should be put
> into gbf or not used at all.  I also have to make sure I don't munge up
> the CVS directories since the module name is still anjuta.  I have code
> in my python script to ignore some files and directories but for some
> reason it does not work.  If I can work out these things I can have a
> patch against CVS by tomorow.  If not then by the end of the weekend.
> 
> I belive changing the CVS module would be as easy as the gnome CVS
> maintainer renaming the directory.  So the big question is are we set on
> scaffold as the name.  As another user has brought up the name Scaffold
> does not stroke the imagination like Anjuta does.  I personaly like
> Scaffold but since the name change was so easy I see no reason not to
> open it up again to other suggestions.
> 
> It is ultimatly up to you Jeroen.
> 
> --
> J5
> 
> On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 15:27, Jeroen Zwartepoorte wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 02:46, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> > > Alright, you are the best.  I needed some good news right now after
> > > writting a stance on the whole SCO/Caldera thing for my local LUG. 
> > > Should I start on the renaming or wait?
> > 
> > Yeah, i've committed the stuff i wanted to commit before the renaming
> > could be done. Feel free to start renaming stuff to scaffold.
> > 
> > A "scaffold" module needs to be created as well eventually in gnome cvs.
> > I don't know how moving the stuff to this module works though (keeping
> > the history etc). Perhaps some cvs admins can help with that.
> > 
> > Jeroen
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-devtools mailing list
> > gnome-devtools gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devtools
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-devtools mailing list
> gnome-devtools gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devtools