Re: Anjuta2 renaming status

["John (J5) Palmieri" <johnp martianrock com>]

On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 02:26, arief_mulya wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> 
> What a nice thing to hear then. I was afraid that my bringing up the
> issue in a such a late moment would give trouble for you John, which in
> fact it doesn't. But I do apologize for not bringing this up earlier.
>  
Scaffold has been confirmed by Jeroen so while your reasons for wanting
something different are valid we are going to move forward with that
name.  Have no fear though as Anjuta itself will still be around and
activly developed.  It is a completely seperate project and hopefully
this will add a bit of diveristy to the GNOME IDE landscape.  I know
some people hate having similar projects but I have already outlined why
this is a good thing in a previous post.  Note that this is not a fork
but two seperate projects that never got around to merging.

For a bit more romance:

She sped towards the work site, anxious to see the progress being made
on the project. Over the horizon came the unmistakable sight of the
erected scaffold which acted as a protection and build tool for the as
yet unfinished project.  Her heart filled with a deep pride as she
watched the scaffold tightly hugging the inner structure, following its
every curve and angle, sparks flying as workers moved back and forth
through the maze of steel and pine.  Tracing the lines with the tip of
her finger she realized her part in building what would be a symbol of
freedom for generations to come.  Satisfied, she continued on.

Hehe.  Thought I would at least try ;-)

> For me, a name brings up first impression about a thing. And my heart do
> falls for romantism when I know the story behind Anjuta name. But I
> don't know what could be the nice new name for Anjuta2. Maybe Naba have
> suggestions? As he is the one who name it at the first place.
Naba works on the Anjuta project which is why we are renaming Anjuta 2.  Basicly we want 
to get away from this confusion.

--
J5