Re: gnome-system-tools / setup-tools-backend and st
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- To: Carlos Garnacho <garnacho tuxerver net>
- Cc: GNOME I18N List <gnome-i18n gnome org>, GNOME Release Team <release-team gnome org>, GNOME Desktop Development List <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, Christian Rose <menthos gnome org>
- Subject: Re: gnome-system-tools / setup-tools-backend and st
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:05:00 +1000
<quote who="Carlos Garnacho">
> > Yeah. To clarify, this is just pulled into g-s-t via a CVS module
> > include, right? ie. no one needs tarballs of it, etc? Perhaps we should
> > change that?
>
> yes, the backends/ directory in the g-s-t module is a link to setup-
> tools-backends, I planned to finally propose the backends to fd.o and make
> g-s-t depend on this after the 2.8 (and gst 1.0) timeframe :), should this
> be done before?
Your call. :-) My first thought is that a split may make contributing easier
for both modules, but I'm not really sure. Maybe it makes more sense to get
a kickarse 1.0 out first, though. :-)
- Jeff
--
GVADEC 2004: Kristiansand, Norway http://2004.guadec.org/
If Perl is gaffer, and Python is Magic Tape, then Ruby is self-adhesive
plate gold.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]