Re: [gnome-network]Gnom-Remote-Shell future direction
- From: Ross Golder <ross golder org>
- To: Ulrich Neumann <U_Neumann gne de>
- Cc: gnome-network-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [gnome-network]Gnom-Remote-Shell future direction
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 10:11:17 +0700
On อา., 2004-01-25 at 18:52 +0100, Ulrich Neumann wrote:
> I don't like this idea because people that work on a GUI most of the
> time prefer a "Putty" like tool to get remote access to other systems.
> This includes access to other systems like NetWare and Windows as well.
I don't understand. Please define 'people that work on a GUI'.
With all due respect, I would have to disagree about preferring to
download Putty. I hate having to download Putty every time I'm on a
Windows PC somewhere, and I need 'remote access to other systems'.
> Otherwise people need to open a Terminal before they can open a remote
> shell. I think many people don't find this way because it is not
> intuitive.
>
Again, I'd have to disagree. I think it is far more intuitive to have
SSH/telnet (and hopefully one day, even serial comms a.l.a. Minicom/
HyperTrm) in one place than to have to go find out which tool you need
and then have to download, install and configure it.
The only reason I can think of for not merging the two would be platform
bloat, but I think that it would be minimal, and that while SSH and
telnet are the lingua-franca of network terminal protocols, the benefits
of merging outweigh the bloat argument.
Regards,
--
Ross
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]