Le dim, 13/06/2004 à 14:44 +0100, Rajil Saraswat a écrit : > On Sunday 13 June 2004 14:30, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > > > > Is there any rules i can put up for netmeeting? Will openphone work fine > > > instead of netmeeting with these rules(supposing there is no GM for > > > windoz)? > > > > You misunderstood. Those rules are ok for a gnomemeeting behind NAT, not > > for a Netmeeting behind NAT. But with those rules any H.323 client can > > call your GnomeMeeting behind NAT. > > > I am a bit confused now. Let me make my network clear. Remote Netmeeting is > not behind any NAT. The connections goes like this: > Remote Netmeeting<>My proxy server(with iptable rules)<>My internal client. > > The faq says that "We do not provide help for setups where Netmeeting is > installed in your LAN, it is far more complicated than with GnomeMeeting as > you have no control over ports." and microsoft's website says that "Pass > through secondary UDP connections on dynamically assigned ports (1024-65535). > " > > Under these circumstances and those rules, is it Netmeeting<>internal GM still > expected to run? > I will repeat it a 4th time : - with teh rules from the FAQ and GnomeMeeting behind your NAT gateway, *ANY* H.323 client is supposed to be able to have successful calls with you. > cheers > Rajil > _______________________________________________ > Gnomemeeting-devel-list mailing list > Gnomemeeting-devel-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-devel-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=