Re: [PATCH] 2 G_CONST_RETURNs
- From: murrayc t-online de (Murray Cumming)
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2 G_CONST_RETURNs
- Date: 23 Oct 2001 16:23:57 +0200
On Tue, 2001-10-23 at 15:41, Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> murrayc t-online de (Murray Cumming) writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2001-10-22 at 02:04, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2001-10-22 at 01:47, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > > >
> > > > murrayc t-online de (Murray Cumming) writes:
> > > > > May I commit this patch, which adds some G_CONST_RETURNs so that
> > > > > language bindings (and people) know that they should free the gchar*
> > > > > return values?
> > > >
> > > > Presumably you mean "not free" rather than "free"
> > >
> > > Yes.
> >
> > Do I have permission to commit this?
>
> IMO, this falls under the "clist is deprecated don't touch it category",
> so no, I'd rather not see this change made.
OK. But what about the 2 FontSelection functions?
> Basically, any language binding is going to need a little bit
> of manual intervention on eway or the other.
Of course, but let's fix what we can. And G_CONST_RETURN is needed
documentation anyway.
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]