Oh, ok. I was using the 2.0.x line -- for some reason I thought RH 8.0 came with 2.1/2.2, but I see now I was mistaken. Thanks, Rachel On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 17:06, Owen Taylor wrote: > > Rachel Hestilow <hestilow ximian com> writes: > > > As a related issue, what would you think of moving all function argument > > names as declared in .h to their own namespace? I ask this because I'm > > getting tired of seeing warning spew when I turn on -Wshadow (mostly > > because of the libc "index" function). > > Have you tried recently? Soeren Sandmann spent a bunch of time prior > to 2.2 fixing conflicts with system headers with changes of the > form s/index/index_/. > > Regards, > Owen > > > > Pros: > > 1) Could be done with a perl script > > 2) Won't incur any code changes, as it would it only be changing the > > header prototypes, not the actual implementations. > > 3) Gtk-doc, et al, should still work, since gtk-doc statements are in > > sources, not headers. > > [ 3) is not actually quite true - the names in the headers need to match > the the gtk-doc comments, so changes were needed to the doc comments > as well. ] > _______________________________________________ > gtk-devel-list mailing list > gtk-devel-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part