Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
- From: Allin Cottrell <cottrell wfu edu>
- To: Florian Müllner <fmuellner gnome org>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list <gtk-devel-list gnome org>, David Nečas <yeti physics muni cz>
- Subject: Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
- Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 18:44:03 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Florian Müllner wrote:
The worst thing that can happen when the toolkit forcefully rips
CSD from applications is that there is no more UI to save,
navigate, load or whatever essential UI the applications happens
to put into its decorations.
Isn't there some dissonance here: "essential UI" embedded in
"decorations"? How did we come to this? I can sort of see why if
metacity is taken as the baseline, since metacity in its default
appearance suffered from a severe case of macroencephaly: a huge
wasteland of bare forehead holding a bloated boldface window title
and little else. But why not fix the WM (not all WMs waste anything
like that amount of desktop) rather than conflating UI with
decoration?
Allin Cottrel
- References:
- GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
- Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
- Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
- Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
- Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
- Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
- Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
- Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
- Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]