RE: A GNOME Bindings release set?
- From: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- To: james daa com au
- Cc: charlet ACT-Europe FR, mkestner ximian com, language-bindings gnome org, release-team gnome org
- Subject: RE: A GNOME Bindings release set?
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:13:05 +0100
> I do agree that some separation is a good idea (eg. pygtk is separate
> from gnome-python, and has been ported to Windows while gnome-python
> hasn't), but not necessarily to the granularity that the
> Gnome platform
> libraries have been.
>
>
> Unless you have some better reasons, could we leave this requirement
> out? It would be a shame if the bindings release set can't be done
> because of something like this.
I am not asking for complete modularity. I am just asking that you don't put
non-GNOME Development Platform stuff in any package that will be on the list
for this release set. That probably means just one split if any. I don't
think that I can manage the release set unless this happens, and I don't
want to spend my life explaining the confused state of such a release set to
the world's developers.
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
murrayc usa net
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]