Re: Galeon2 / Nautilus as a web browser [was: Re: KDE Interop [Was: D-BUS background]]

[Vadim Plessky <plessky cnt ru>]

On Monday 10 March 2003 13:49, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
|  mån 2003-03-10 klockan 11.09 skrev Vadim Plessky:
|  > My point is: it's not enough to make good product.
|  > You should put efforts to make that product distributed.
|  > And, speaking about browsers: you should give very good reason to
|  > packagers/distribution maintainer *why* you want to add 2 (or even 3, if
|  > you count Phoenix) more browsers to already existing 2 or so.
|  > Forking Galeon codebase into two branches is not very good idea, IMHO.
|
|  Why should the distributions ship all available browsers? That's just
|  idiotic. The distribution chooses whatever browser fits best in there
|  environment.
|
|  If they go for a KDE desktop they will ship with Konquerer, if they
|  choose a GNOME desktop they might choose Galeon or Epiphany depending on
|  there desktop focus.

So far, all major distributions (Mandrake, RedHat, SuSE) ship both GNOME and 
KDE.
So, the question is open - what browsers distribution should ship (if any).

|
|  Regards,
|    Mikael Hallendal

-- 
Best Regards,

Vadim Plessky
SVG Icons * BlueSphere Icons 0.3.0 released
http://svgicons.sourceforge.net