Re: Mono/GTK#/Tomboy
- From: Alex Jones <alex weej com>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Mono/GTK#/Tomboy
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:41:40 +0100
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 21:26 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 18:10 -0700, Alex Graveley wrote:
> > Hi Murray,
> >
> > As I hinted at back in April[1], I don't think Tomboy is a blanket
> > replacement for sticky notes. As I said, into the abyss, a first-run
> > wizard for importing existing sticky notes makes more sense.
>
> In my opinion, having both would be a very odd duplication of
> functionality, and would be confusing for users and distros. What can
> sticky notes do that Tomboy can't?
Sticky Notes is SIMPLE. I love them. If I need to quickly write a
telephone number down I can create a nice, yellow(!) Sticky Note with
one click, type the number, and be done.
With Tomboy I need to think about a note title. As simple a task as that
is, most of the time I really can't be bothered.
Also, having pale yellow Sticky Notes with dropshadows and such is a
VERY nice effect with Compiz! I love the way they all hide away! :)
So, I answer your question with another question. Why do you think they
occupy the same use profile? I think tomboy is more for organising
information than for jotting down phone numbers.
>
> > I'm somewhat unfamiliar with the GNOME acceptance process. Was I
> > expected to do this work in the interim time frame?
>
> You're not hostage to every guy who emails on d-d-l list, but you need
> to make the release-team feel that there's consensus and that nothing
> odd is going to happen. More or less. I'm not on the release team.
>
--
Alex Jones <alex weej com>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]