Re: Module proposal: Empathy for GNOME 2.24



Am Mittwoch, den 26.03.2008, 17:18 +0100 schrieb Patryk Zawadzki:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Sven Herzberg <herzi gnome-de org> wrote:
> >  Am Dienstag, den 25.03.2008, 23:16 -0700 schrieb Eitan Isaacson:
> > > Feature completeness, license issues and your favorite IRC client are trivial
> > > issues that could be worked out.
> >  If they were trivial, why haven't they been sorted out after the denial
> >  in the last cycle, it would have helped a lot to be able to tell people
> >  "your critics from the last proposal cycle are not valid anymore", but
> >  as you can see, they are still valid; why IMHO proved, that these issues
> >  are _not_ trivial ones.
> 
> As I see it, the license is currently not a problem and was not raised
> as such in the 2.22 cycle (it was only noted that this could be an
> issue if GNOME decided to move to v3 licenses but certainly was not a
> showstopper then and is not one today).

The GPL vs. LGPL issue (which was reference by Olav's link to the
release team decision) was brought up by me in the 2.22 cycle [1], so
don't just claim wrong things, stick to facts please. I know this is a
very-hard discussed topic, but to me it feels like there haven't been
any attempts on fixing the real blockers, so this is definitely a -1
from me (because of lacking community interaction - which was the reason
to noch accept gnome-main-menu some cycles ago).

[1]http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2007-September/msg00554.html

Regards,
  Sven



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]