Re: Gnome canvas issues
- From: Aidan Cully <aidan kublai com>
- To: Simon Kagedal <simon sdf se>
- Cc: Michael Fulbright <msf redhat com>, gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Gnome canvas issues
- Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 17:38:03 -0400
On Sat, Jul 10, 1999 at 06:18:55PM +0200, Simon Kagedal wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> I'm also a Canvas newbie, so sorry if this is "well duhh" to you. But
> it seems to work if you do gnome_canvas_item_move instead of
> setting "x" and "y", like this:
...
> The question why it doesn't work as well with setting "x" and "y" is
> something I'd like to hear the answer to as well.
That's just what I needed to figure out what was wrong here. It looks
like gnome_canvas_group_set_arg doesn't set the
GNOME_CANVAS_ITEM_NEED_AFFINE flag after updating the "x" and "y"
variables. The following patch fixes this:
--- gnome-canvas.c.orig Sat Jul 10 16:33:39 1999
+++ gnome-canvas.c Sat Jul 10 17:34:24 1999
@@ -1611,6 +1611,13 @@
if (item->parent)
gnome_canvas_group_child_bounds (GNOME_CANVAS_GROUP (item->parent), item);
+ if (!(item->object.flags & GNOME_CANVAS_ITEM_NEED_AFFINE)) {
+ item->object.flags |= GNOME_CANVAS_ITEM_NEED_AFFINE;
+ if (item->parent != NULL)
+ gnome_canvas_item_request_update (item->parent);
+ else
+ gnome_canvas_request_update (item->canvas);
+ }
}
}
After applying this to libgnomeui, gglobe-canvas worked just great.
HTH,
--aidan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]