Re: Bug-buddy feature requests (was Re: Does the bug tracker actually work?)

[Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>]

Owen Taylor <otaylor@redhat.com> writes:

> I don't see the difference between a) and b). In either case,
> the backtrace is useless,  but a clueful user could still produce
> a useful bug report. (And I've seen quite a few useful bug reports
> coming from Red Hat users, where all binaries are stripped. Along
> with lots of useless ones...) In either case, bug buddy should not
> include the backtrace, include the binary name if it can figure
> it out, and ask the user to provide sufficient additional
> information.

Well, non-stripped binaries without debbuging info may be useful when
they have at least the function names.

-- 
Martin Baulig
martin@gnome.org (private)
baulig@suse.de (work)