Re: Assertions and Such
- From: Sean Middleditch <sean middleditch iname com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Assertions and Such
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 10:32:31 -0400
Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Sean Middleditch <sean.middleditch@iname.com> writes:
> > What would be the performance gain if distributed binaries had these
> > disabled? Would it make much of a difference?
> >
>
> No, the performance difference isn't noticeable.
OK then! As a game programmer, I'm used to pushing for every single bit of
performance possible, but I guess that doesn't really apply to GUI-type
apps. ^,^
> > And, if these were disabled by default, then any distributed application
> > would have to be guaranteed to not fail such assertions, since the app
> > would crash a lot. Would developers then make more effort to ensure
> > their apps are error-free?
>
> Don't know. People are supposed to consider the warnings bugs. Some
> people apparently do not. ;-)
Ya. Like I said, if a piece of my code has so much as one warning, I won't
release it till the warning is squashed and gone... Maybe everyone just
isn't as picky as I am.
> Havoc
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-devel-list mailing list
> gnome-devel-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devel-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]