Re: Process Tree
- From: Galvanick Lucipher <ahosey systhug com>
- To: gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Process Tree
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:57:08 -0500 (EST)
On 25 Oct 2000, Tom Tromey wrote:
:
: For local restarts gnome-session uses gnome_execute_async_with_env.
: This function launches the new executable as a grandchild (not child)
: of the current process. I wrote gnome_execute_async_with_env this
: way because it let us avoid dealing with SIGCHLD / zombie issues in
: the Gnome libraries.
:
: That was a kind of lazy decision on my part. SIGCHLD handling could
: be moved into glib, I guess. That would be a "fix" in a way. It's an
: ugly situation because this handling is global to the process, but
: different modules in the process might have different desires and
: expectations. I consider it one of the warts on Unix.
I ran into the grandchild issue when I wanted to launch a subprocess with
gnome_execute_async_with_env() and then waitpid() on it. I didn't know
(until I tried) that you can't wait on a grandchild. I managed to work
around it but it seems to break the Principle of Least Surprise. Like you
say, it's just ugly.
--
http://web.systhug.com/
If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly
imagine.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]