Re: GAL, glade and libglade

I was actually thinking about doing this a while back.  Now that my
machine is stable (hardware problems, not software), I think I'll take
a crack at it.  Any suggestions of where to start?  I've read through
the new docs on the gtk+ site, but I haven't grabbed a CVS snapshot in
a while.  

John Margaglione
jmargaglione yahoo com

--- Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com> wrote:
> James Henstridge <james daa com au> writes: 
> > If all widgets were fully customisable from the GtkArg interfaces,
> then
> > this glue code could probably go as well.  I guess this is
> something to
> > aim at for gtk 2.0/gnome 2.0
> > 
> It would certainly be nice. If someone actually took on the task of
> a)
> converting all existing GtkArg to the GObject equivalent, so they
> have
> docs and change notification and b) ensuring all set/get functions
> are
> also exported as properties, for both GTK and gnome-libs, they would
> be godlike heroes of GNOME. ;-)
> Heck I'd settle for someone creating and maintaining a comprehensive
> TODO list of all properties that should exist or be converted to
> GObject so we know what the status is...
> Haovoc
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-devel-list mailing list
> gnome-devel-list gnome org

Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]