Re: [gnome-network]GTransferManager Architecture
- From: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>
- To: Rodney Dawes <dobey free fr>
- Cc: gnome-network-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [gnome-network]GTransferManager Architecture
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 22:38:45 +0200
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 16:04 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> So,
>
sorry for the delay in answering.
> I've got the basics of The Project Formerly Known as Emphetamine (TM)
> ported over to gnome-network. In the process of doing so, I've been
> pondering about how things will need to interact together. And, I've
> come to realize how painful it will be if the lowest common denominator
> of a back-end is display-dependent. So, I think we may need something of
> a "middle-man" to sit on top of the back-end, and then the front-ends
> will talk to this middle-man, which will handle the necessary
> display-dependent bits of the transfer manager, such as doing some of
> the notification area interaction, popping up a file-selector if need
> be, authentication dialogs, and similar other minor GUI tasks.
>
> What do people think about this?
>
> +--> DISPLAY=:0.0 manager <--> DISPLAY=:0.0 front-end
> back-end <--+
> +--> DISPLAY=:1.0 manager <--> DISPLAY=:1.0 front-end
>
> This is basically how the interaction would probably go, between the
> different processes. I'd like to get any potentially useful feedback,
> before fully implementing all of this. So, let's have it. :)
>
hmm, how would the communication be between all parts?
cheers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]