Re: Fwd: Plans for GTK+ Bundles for win32 and win64?



On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 22:07:59 +0200, Kean Johnston wrote:

> No I wasn't proposing it at all, I was just saying what was POSSIBLE as a 
> means of combating the question posed. What i *ACTUALLY* propose is an 
> easily installable set of DLL's that register themselves properly and will 
> not let an older version overwrite a newer one, and rely on backwards 
> compatibility among the minor releases. Thus, I do propose the library be 
> named libglib-2.0.dll *as long as* the installation mechanism ensures that 
> an installation of 2.26.x cant overwrite an installation of 2.28.x.

I'm pretty sure every reasonable installer won't let you overwrite newer
file version with an older one.

-- 
< Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ >



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]