Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel ucw cz>
- To: Florian Müllner <fmuellner gnome org>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list <gtk-devel-list gnome org>, Allin Cottrell <cottrell wfu edu>, David Nečas <yeti physics muni cz>
- Subject: Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 22:45:21 +0100
On Fri 2015-03-06 01:21:32, Florian Müllner wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:59 AM Paul Davis <paul linuxaudiosystems com>
wrote:
consider a simple dialog. Should it have a close button or not? If the
application adds an explicit close button, there are now two areas of the
window as displayed by most WMs which will, upon being clicked, cause the
window to be hidden.
Yes, in case of server-side decorations. When using client-side
decorations, the expectation is that the WM does not add any controls at
all and the application can add as many close buttons as it sees fit (read:
one). Though to be honest, a simple dialog is not too interesting
Well, there's slight difference: if the application hangs, the
WM-provided close button will still work (application hung, force
close?) while the client-side close button will be useless.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
- References:
- Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
- Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
- Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
- Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
- Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
- Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
- Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
- Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
- Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
- Re: GTK+, WM, desktops and CSD
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]