Re: http://www.gtk.org/bindings.html

["muppet" <scott asofyet org>]

Murray Cumming said:
> It's a bit less vague now, so some of the information might be wrong,
> but that's probably the only way to make people tell us the correct
> information.

for Perl -- under GTK+-1.2, it may be appropriate to link to
http://www.gtkperl.org, since that project supported GTK+ from 0.99 to 1.2.
E.g., in the "Platform Bindings" section for Perl in the GTK+ 1.2 column,
instead of "none", put an asterisk that links to the anchor around "Perl -
GtkPerl" in the "Others" section.

Also, either "-" or a blank cell for "none" may help mitigate some of the
visual density of the table.  And maybe a splash of color-coding for good
measure.  :-)


As for "complete" verus "almost complete" versus "supported" -- is that based
on api coverage?  If so, what percentile is "Complete"?  Are there audits for
completeness or does it work on the honor system?

-- 
muppet <scott at asofyet dot org>