Re: Formalising the release naming process [Was: GNOME Development Release 2.5.3]

On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 01:49 +0000, Sander Vesik wrote:
> Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 01:13 +0000, Sander Vesik wrote:
> >>Wait for the next seasonal installment of "Open Source and its growing 
> >>pains in going mainstream" articles?
> > I tend to believe the majority of people in all areas are not so
> > immature as to take such a reference as "offensive".
> until what followed a certain "incident" at super bowl i might have 
> thought so too.

Very vocal minorities... it's like many whiners at /. it seems like a
crowd, but the US has millions of people living there that really didn't
care, just like the Lewinsky-cigar^Wgate.



+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]