Re: Where we stand in regard to the future platform / desktop technology

On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 19:39 -0500, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> An attempt to secure the desktop by screwing the users out of powerful
> and needed features instead of just securing the platform properly is
> about as bad, if not worse, than any proprietary company "securing"
> their software by hiding the code.  Users would rather have a system
> that needs a virus scanner but at least does what they need than a
> system that has no need for a virus scanner but can't get the work done
> they need it to do.

This is so wrong in so many aspects that I just can't believe I'm
reading this.


+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]