On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 19:39 -0500, Sean Middleditch wrote: > An attempt to secure the desktop by screwing the users out of powerful > and needed features instead of just securing the platform properly is > about as bad, if not worse, than any proprietary company "securing" > their software by hiding the code. Users would rather have a system > that needs a virus scanner but at least does what they need than a > system that has no need for a virus scanner but can't get the work done > they need it to do. This is so wrong in so many aspects that I just can't believe I'm reading this. Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part